Quality & Compliance

Remove barriers to using your website and product.

Start a conversation

Identify and fix accessibility, performance and security issues with clear priorities and a defined review scope.

A difficult form, slow loading or unsuitable permissions can get in the way of using a product. A focused review helps establish what needs attention and in what order.

Work can include findings, code changes and a follow-up review. Standards assessments, penetration testing and accessibility statements require an explicit scope and agreement on the specialists involved.

What the project can include

  • Issue mappingReview selected pages and workflows, documenting findings by impact and priority.
  • Accessibility fixesAddress page structure, labels, keyboard navigation, focus and contrast based on the findings.
  • Accessibility documentationRecord the tested scope, remaining limitations and contact details to support a statement that reflects the actual site.
  • Performance improvementsFind loading and interaction bottlenecks, apply changes and compare results under defined test conditions.
  • Security reviewReview agreed areas such as permissions and data handling. Penetration testing, if needed, is scoped separately.

Who this is for

  • Websites where tasks or keyboard navigation are difficult
  • Products with slow loading or response times
  • Teams that need to document and prioritise technical issues
  • Businesses preparing for a specialist assessment

From need to solution

  1. Define the scopeChoose workflows, pages, devices and review objectives.
  2. Review and prioritiseDocument findings and agree which issues need attention first.
  3. Fix and recheckApply changes and repeat the relevant checks to assess the result.
  4. Summarise and hand overRecord what was resolved, what remains and whether further review is needed.

Tools and considerations by project

  • Automated and manual checks within an agreed scope
  • Keyboard navigation and assistive technology
  • Loading and response metrics, including Core Web Vitals
  • OWASP guidance as a basis for technical review
  • Project-specific accessibility and privacy requirements, coordinated with qualified specialists

Common questions

Does this include a compliance certificate?

A technical review and remediation do not constitute legal certification. If a formal assessment is needed, the standard, scope and qualified assessor must be agreed in advance.

Can you review just part of the site?

Yes. The scope can focus on a form, checkout flow or key template. Findings apply only to what was reviewed.

Does every issue require a redesign?

Not necessarily. Labels, contrast, focus and navigation order can often be improved within the current design. Changes depend on the findings.

When should we check again?

After significant changes to content, templates or functionality. Follow-up frequency and scope depend on the product and how it changes.

What gets in the way of using your site?

Tell us about a problem, feedback you received or a workflow you want reviewed.

Start a conversation